Google's 2025–2026 updates to Performance Max campaigns—including channel-level reporting, better brand exclusions, and improved coexistence with standard Shopping—have not quieted the debate over whether PMax is a smart AI-native format or an opaque budget drain. Here is what the evidence says for small and midsize ecommerce operators.
AmSpa survey data and 2026 ad benchmarks reveal that the average med spa spends 7% of revenue on marketing — slightly below the cross-industry norm — while Beauty and Personal Care paid search costs dropped sharply and repeat patients already account for nearly three-quarters of visit volume.
New benchmark data shows attorneys and legal services average $131.63 per Google Ads lead — more than double the cross-industry average — while Clio's survey data finds referrals remain the top client source, yet 87% of declined prospects never get referred anywhere else. For personal injury firms, response speed and referral discipline may matter as much as ad spend.
Rising ad costs on both Google and Meta are forcing ecommerce marketers to make harder allocation decisions. Benchmark data, Q2 2026 earnings disclosures, and industry reports suggest the two platforms serve different funnel stages — and that treating them as either/or choices consistently underperforms a coordinated strategy.
Google's AI Overviews are measurably suppressing organic click-through rates, hitting e-commerce brands hardest on upper-funnel informational queries. The industry is split three ways on how to respond — shift budget to Google Ads, diversify to Meta and owned channels, or restructure content for AI citation — while rising paid-media costs put pressure on thin-margin merchants.
