Google's 2025–2026 updates to Performance Max campaigns—including channel-level reporting, better brand exclusions, and improved coexistence with standard Shopping—have not quieted the debate over whether PMax is a smart AI-native format or an opaque budget drain. Here is what the evidence says for small and midsize ecommerce operators.
Meta's fully automated Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns have become the most debated paid-media product in DTC circles this fall, with believers citing efficiency gains and skeptics warning that handing the algorithm creative control risks brand equity. Independent attribution vendors flag methodology problems with Meta's native reporting, while agencies are advising a hybrid approach—automated buying paired with rigorous external measurement and human-led creative testing.
AmSpa survey data and 2026 ad benchmarks reveal that the average med spa spends 7% of revenue on marketing — slightly below the cross-industry norm — while Beauty and Personal Care paid search costs dropped sharply and repeat patients already account for nearly three-quarters of visit volume.
Rising ad costs on both Google and Meta are forcing ecommerce marketers to make harder allocation decisions. Benchmark data, Q2 2026 earnings disclosures, and industry reports suggest the two platforms serve different funnel stages — and that treating them as either/or choices consistently underperforms a coordinated strategy.
Frustrated by stubbornly high Meta CPMs and murky Advantage+ reporting, a growing number of direct-to-consumer brands are diverting performance ad dollars into connected television. Early movers in home goods, fitness equipment, personal care, pet care, and subscription food report measurable lift — but the channel demands a patience and planning discipline that conflicts with how most DTC growth teams are wired.
